There is an incorrect statement on pag. 303 of my paper ³Logic in category theory² appeared in the volume Logic, Mathematics, Philosophy (DeVidi, Hallett, Clark eds, 2011), where it is said that in 1979 <<Robert Goldblatt¹s lattice-theoretically oriented introduction, [22], allowed logicians to learn of semantics for first-order theories in toposes; unfortunately, adjoints only appear in Ch. 16 which was added to the 2nd (1984) edition, and play no role before this.>>. My reference was to Goldblatt¹s Topoi. The Categorial Analysis of Logic and what I meant was that this book, which as a graduate I found helpful indeed, made substantial use of adjoints within a categorical formulation of logic in chapter 16 (added in the 1984 edition), whereas I knew that they were already defined in chapter 15 (which is the last chapter in the first edition of the book, published in 1979) and used in the same chapter for the analysis of quantifiers. The need to be brief led me to a statement which erroneously says that adjoints ³appear², i.e. are introduced in chapter 16: adjoints were already introduced in chapter 15 where they obviously played a role. Thus the claim they ³play no role before this² is wrong at face value, although their presence simply shifts to what was the <last> chapter of the previous edition. As for what I referred to for ³role² , I intended the role of adjoints in a fully axiomatic presentation of logic, which actually is not made explicit until chapter 16. Alberto Peruzzi [For admin and other information see: http://www.mta.ca/~cat-dist/ ]