16 May
2010
16 May
'10
6:44 p.m.
André wrote: Too simple to be true?
No, I always hoped for a simple proof! And this proof is not "too simple". It seems all the hard work is packed into the formalism that underlies the proof. And that's how it should be, I think. So, I'm happy. Best, jb [For admin and other information see: http://www.mta.ca/~cat-dist/ ]