27 Mar
2015
27 Mar
'15
4:30 p.m.
If I had thought Richard's monad was on the category of sets, I'd have answered the same way: | From: Michael Barr <barr@math.mcgill.ca> | | > Recently there was a question as to whether these coequalizers exist. | > Unless I have misunderstood the question, the affirmative answer is given | > in the example in the middle of p.72 of Linton's paper in TAC reprint #18. But Richard writes of his monad as being "on the category of locales", and there I'm not so sure ... . Cheers, -- Fred [For admin and other information see: http://www.mta.ca/~cat-dist/ ]