Dear Claudio, The statement is true. You can prove that any factorization h:AxB->X must be the one you thought of by using the fact that h is a monoid morphism. Uniqueness and commutativity of monoid structure will be a consequence. Best wishes, Steve. On 13/03/2013, at 12:58 AM, claudio pisani wrote:
Dear categorists,
in several places I have seen variants of the following statement (or its dual):
If C is a symmetrical monoidal category and every object has a natural monoid structure (that is any map is a monoid morphism) then C is cocartesian monoidal (tensor = sums).
I have not found any proof of the general statement. In fact the tensor product of two objects has obvious maps A -> AxB <-B and for any A -> X <- B it's easy to see that there is at least one factorization AxB -> X. The problem is unicity. If the monoid structure on objects is unique, then that on AxB (and on I) has to be the usual one and unicity follows.
Question: is the statement true in the above general form or one has to assume that the monoid structure on objects is unique? Or that it is commutative?
I would be grateful for any suggestion or reference.
Claudio
[For admin and other information see: http://www.mta.ca/~cat-dist/ ]