Re: Achieving "neither P nor not P"

On 12/15/2014 2:03 AM, Steve Vickers wrote:

In reality, P may be interpreted in a variety of situations, with different analyses. Some good examples come from typos theory. Consider P as "changing y to o [is good]".

A triple entendre (change y to o in "typos")! Very gyyd, Steve. And a theory rendered commendable by the absence of tedious debate about the plural of "typos". "Sketches of a giraph" for the definitive wyrk? Vaughan [For admin and other information see: http://www.mta.ca/~cat-dist/ ]