soloviev@irit.fr wrote:
My personal opinion is that this process is very much influenced by the pressure of "bibliometry", "impact factors" and other "modern trends" - people often not very scrupulously invent and reinvent terminology to be better cited, and, conscious or not, it often very much smells of imposture.
Sergei Soloviev
I agree with this. But it should be clear that many times it is not conscious, but certainly it often smells of imposture. Other times it smells of excessive logic and formalism. Concerning "injective" I see no problem at all that some times injective means (1-1) and other times it means the dual of projective. Where is the problem !!, the context always tells you which meaning it is being used. e.d. [For admin and other information see: http://www.mta.ca/~cat-dist/ ]