a fantastic simplification of our subject
4 Apr
1998
4 Apr
'98
3:42 p.m.
I can't make Mike's proof type-check, so let me try the following: For any set-valued functor, T, from any category, let a:O -> T be the unique transformation from the empty functor. Isn't it obviously cartesian? Has Mike shown all set-valued functors are empty? Good heavens.
10284
Age (days ago)
10284
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Peter Freyd