I am sure that I speak for all of us in the category theory community when I say that I am very (relieved and) pleased to hear from Mike Mislove that he and ENTCS are alive and well following the hurricane. On the other hand, I am alarmed by the keenness of Mike (and the many conference organisers who use the services of ENTCS) to give away their colleagues' intellectual property to a company whose sole contribution nowadays to the process of publication is to run a web server. In point of fact, Elsevier DOES NOT require ENTCS authors to transfer copyright. When they were processing my paper for last year's CTCS, they asked me for a copyright transfer, but I refused. Instead, they promptly offered me a license agreement. Although the first version of this was also unacceptable, I succeeded in negotiating another one, which I signed, and they published my paper. You can obtain a LaTeX version of this agreement from www.cs.man.ac.uk/~pt/drafts/Elsevier-licence.tex I urge all of my colleagues to use this, and not give a commercial publisher the monopoly of research in theoretical computer science. I fully understand that younger researchers in particular feel that they have no alternative but to give in to pressure, being in a polically weak position myself. But I have demonstrated that even individuals can have an effect, simply by saying no. If more of us say no then we will succeed in recovering what is properly ours. Paul Taylor PS there is lots of new stuff on the ASD web page since my last posting to "categories" about it.