Michael Makkai has shown that something called the Craig Interpolation lemma is equivalent to fact that in Heyting algebras a pushout of an injection is an injection. Now it is easy to show that a pushout of an injection with a quotient map is an injection, so the question is reduced to the amalgamation property. Anyone have an easy proof of that? Michael 444444444444444444444444444444444444
Michael Makkai has shown that something called the Craig Interpolation lemma is equivalent to fact that in Heyting algebras a pushout of an injection is an injection.
To be precise I think Michael was claiming a new proof of the latter fact (the equivalence of CI to pushout stability is well known, to some).
Now it is easy to show that a pushout of an injection with a quotient map is an injection, so the question is reduced to the amalgamation property. Anyone have an easy proof of that?
For a constructive (and easy!) proof see my paper "Amalgamation and interpolation in the category of Heyting algebras", Jour Pure Appl. Algebra 29(1983)155--165. Andy Pitts ======================================
participants (2)
-
Andrew.Pitts@cl.cam.ac.uk -
barr@triples.Math.McGill.CA