CiteSeer appears to have slightly better quality (not scanned) ps and pdf (= probably generated from the ps) versions linked from this page: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=3D10.1.1.45.6517 -- Rich On Jul 6, 2014, at 8:45 AM, Michael Barr wrote:

I did finally get it, but only by downloading it and renaming it complexi= ty.pdf (from complexity with no suffix). It is clearly scanned in rather t= han an original pdf file. It is readable, but relatively poor quality. I = suppose this form of publication has superceded University Microfilms (whic= h produced much poorer quality, in part because the originals were just typ= ed). =20 I had no idea McGill was doing this. You live and learn. =20 Thanks, Michael =20 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Hiroyuki Miyoshi" <hxm@cc.kyoto-su.ac.jp> To: "Michael Barr" <barr@math.mcgill.ca> Cc: "Vasili I. Galchin" <vigalchin@gmail.com>, "Categories mailing list" = <categories@mta.ca> Sent: Sunday, July 6, 2014 1:00:29 AM Subject: Re: categories: Re: "classical" computability theory and the cat= egory of Sets =20 Hi, Michael and Vasya =20 I remember Jim Otto and his thesis. It is downloadable from this page: =20 http://digitool.library.mcgill.ca/R/?func=3Ddbin-jump-full&object_id=3D29= 104&local_base=3DGEN01-MCG02 =20 Hiroyuki Miyoshi =20

[For admin and other information see: http://www.mta.ca/~cat-dist/ ]