dear cocategorists, given a monoidal 2-category V (i.e. \tensor is a 2-functor in each variable) there is an obvious definition of lax V-functors, lax V-transformations and modifications between V-categories (in the ordinary sense). has this been studied anywhere? -- cheers, björn Article 10 from the Universal Declaration of Human Rights Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and obligations and of any criminal charge against him. [For admin and other information see: http://www.mta.ca/~cat-dist/ ]
Dear Björn, In my recent preprint "Not every pseudoalgebra is equivalent to a strict one" (arXiv:1005.1520), I had occasion to consider pseudo V-categories, pseudo V-functors, and V-icons for such a V -- these form the 2-category Ps-T-Alg for a suitable 2-monad on the 2-category of V-enriched graphs. Obviously lax T-morphisms will similarly be lax V-functors. I didn't have any need for general V-transformations or modifications, and they don't fall as naturally out of the 2-monad setup, but I agree that the definitions are easy to write down. I would also be interested to hear who may have studied these notions in general. Best, Mike 2010/5/24 Björn Gohla <b.gohla@gmx.de>:
dear cocategorists,
given a monoidal 2-category V (i.e. \tensor is a 2-functor in each variable) there is an obvious definition of lax V-functors, lax V-transformations and modifications between V-categories (in the ordinary sense). has this been studied anywhere?
[For admin and other information see: http://www.mta.ca/~cat-dist/ ]
participants (2)
-
Björn Gohla -
Michael Shulman