6 May
1991
6 May
'91
7:16 p.m.
Call a rooted tree supercalifragilistic if no node has isomorphic daughters. There must be a standard word for this; does anyone know what it is? A related question. Let T denote the set of binary rooted trees. There is an idempotent retraction that identifies isomorphic sibs and then repeats this process until you produce a supercalifragilistic tree. This retract is compatible with the morphism T --> 1 + T^2/2! (that means the symmetric square or set of one and two element subsets) that takes a bare root to 1 and a proper tree to its set of daughters. Does anyone know if there are any further retracts that are compatible with that morphism? Michael
12809
Age (days ago)
12809
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
barr@triples.Math.McGill.CA